Punk Hair FAQ

May 4, 2008

Hair Whitening Update

Filed under: hair colour, how-to, info — Ruadhán McElroy @ 4:01 pm

If you’ve read my old tutorial on hair whitening, then you probably realise that it’s about two years old by now. Long story short, after writing that the first time (for the LiveJournal community), I started whitening my hair again, and in the years since then, I’ve come to perfect my craft, so here’s the Update patch:

extra step in the process: If your goal is to whiten your hair, then as you are mixing the bleach, you really should use this additive called Red Gold Corrector Plus. I usually see it at Sally, cos the mom-n-pop type places around here really seem to be lacking in some things. You add this directly to the bleach before applying it to your hair. If you’ve gotten a large or medium-sized bottle of it, then you need about 12-20 drops per ounce of mixed bleach by volume — three ounces by volume of bleach powder plus three ounces by volume of developer mixes to about six ounces by volume of mixed bleach. If you’re buying Red-Gold Corrector Plus in those little snip-open packets, then one whole packet is about what you need for six ounces by volume of mixed bleach.

brand of bleach: I no longer use Kaliedecolours. It’s a great brand that I recommend to anybody who is merely interested in bleaching their hair for whatever purposes, like dying one’s hair with Special Effects of Manic Panic. What I use now is the Salon Care Quickwhite from Sally Beauty Supply. I’m pretty sure “Salon Care” is also their store brand. The problem I was running into with Kaliedecolours was that I kept having to bleach my hair a second time before toner, thus I was going through a whole tub of powder in maybe two or three months. One bucket of Quickwhite lasts me about six to nine months because I’m not only bleaching my hair half as much every time I touch up, but the tub is also a bit bigger than a Kaliedecolours for roughly similar price. Like I said, if you’re going to dye your hair pink or green or something, Kaliedecolours is probably the best that I’ve personally used. And as much as I believe in supporting Manic Panic for their principles and inherent DIY ethic, you just can’t beat the personal touch of getting your own bleaching components and doing it yourself. (Still, if you truly are lazy enough or just don’t want the hassle of mixing your own bleach, definitely stick with the MP bleach kits.)

important note: If you’re like me and have a patch of psoriasis on your scalp, I highly recommend an additive called Bio-Kur. It’s available at Sally in little packets for about 50¢ each. Still, I highly discourage bleaching your hair when your scalp is irritated (and this goes double for those of you with psoriasis that gets dry enough in the winter that your scalp cracks and bleeds). The bleach will only further inflame your scalp.

toners: Another pretty good brand of toner that I’ve been using recently is Icicle, from Clairol’s “Jazzing” line, available at most beauty supplies. There are some major “cons” with using Jazzing, though. First off, Clairol is a division of Proctor & Gamble, a corporation that has been heavily criticised for testing on animals. If you care about that, then you’ll probably want to avoid it. If you want another reason to avoid Jazzing, it’s more “liquidy” than Special Effects (a cream) or Manic Panic (available in both cream and gel), so it drips pretty heavily. It’s toxicity is as equally indeterminate as Special effects, but I didn’t see a “blindness” warning, so I prepped my eyelids with petroleum jelly and did my eyebrows a few times and experienced no serious issues. In its pros, it has got to be the best semi-permanent toner I’ve tried as, like most other Clairol products, it’s designed to actually soak into the hair’s pores rather than simply coat the hair follicle, and as an added bonus, it’s considerably less pricey than SpFX and MP. I will make a more detailed post about the pros and cons of other dyes later.

toner: In the last year, I discovered and tried out Wella’s permanent hair toners, specifically T-18 “White Lady”. This is the toner that I use most lately because, as I said, it is permanent, and unlike most “permanent” colourants, Wella products are well-known for being safe, gentle, and sometimes even beneficial without sacrificing the product’s effectiveness. Because it’s permanent, you have to mix it with a developer; the instructions in the box suggest using a 20 volume developer, but in the name of science, I tried it with the last of my 10-volume I had under the sink, and it still worked amazingly well. Like Clairol, Wella is also associated with Proctor & Gamble, though P&G just owns a controlling interest in Wella, rather than outright owning it. Still, if you care about animal testing enough to boycott P&G products, you may want to avoid Wella (as well as Tom’s of Maine, as in 2006, it was acquired by Colgate-Palmolive, a mega-corporation that has also been criticised for animal testing, but is allegedly one of the best companies for working mothers — hrmm… which is more important, women or rats, women or rats…).

December 18, 2007

Bleach Q&A

Filed under: hair colour, info — Ruadhán McElroy @ 2:55 pm

I have really dark brown hair right now,
You seem like you know a lot more about this than I do, but I was wondering what color would my hair turn if I left it in there for about five minutes.
Would it turn a lighter brown, or just go orange?

I’m assuming you mean “bleach” here.

Honestly, I have no idea what it might end up looking like. No idea at all. I’ve never left bleach on my hair that long and I’ve been dying my hair since I was about thirteen (when I would use a rinse of concentrated grape juice to tint my naturally auburn hair — and got a perm so I could look like Marc Bolan), and have not seen my natural hair-colour since I was fifteen or sixteen 9when I started dying it black). And, as it is now, I never leave bleach on for “only five minutes”. It takes maybe ten minutes to cover my head with bleach, and as I’m finishing up, the parts I got first have already tinted from dark auburn to a sort of golden-yellowy colour.

But, going on logic rather than memory, depending on the strength of bleach and developer you use, it won’t get very light, but it will probably always have some orangy tint to it, cos that just seems to be the nature of bleach.

August 7, 2007

Dreadlocks removal

Filed under: dreads, how-to, info — Ruadhán McElroy @ 8:57 pm

I just approved a comment about Dreadlocks removal.

I have to say, this is an unusual question for me because most people I know who have dreadlocks understand that dreads are less a fashion and more of a commitment.

The easiest way to remove dreads is to shave your head. I’ve also heard that some people have had moderate to impressive success with simply cutting the hair until each dread is about two or three inches long and then just spending a day with a fine-toothed comb and a LOT of de-tangler or just plain ol’ conditioner. Also, according to the Internet, mydreadlocks.com says that growing the hair out for a month or two *before* cutting your hair and abstaining from rolling, etc, so that the hair at the root is as loose as possible is probably the best way to go if you’re going to cut your hair.

If you feel like spending more than the cost of five bottles of Suave conditioner Knotty Boy makes a dread removal kit that costs $25, or you can buy two kits for $45: [link]
A few satisfied customers are quoted on the Knotty Boy product page, but just keep in mind that such pages are designed to sell you something. If you buy it, keep in mind that results will vary.

I’ve also seem some people recommend Take Down for dreadlock removal.

Now the reason I stated at the beginning of this article that dreads are a *commitment* is because, well, frankly they are. Dreadlocks, be they on white people or black people or any of the Asian persuasions, are something that takes a long time to do and can be a real pain-in-the-ass to take out — and even Knotty Boy’s satisfied customers state that they’ve had to cut a few inches of hair off the ends after removal. Even Whoopi Goldberg has had it suggested to her that if she’d take down her dreads, she’d get more and better parts, but she’s also committed to having dreads, so she pretty much says that if they really don’t want her character to have the same hair, then they could get her a wig, and she’s worn wigs in many of her more famous parts (like Ghost and The Colour Purple and Corina, Corina).

Before you do dreads, you should ask yourself if it’s really reasonable for you to have this hair style for at least a year — it’ll take about that long for them to really “settle in” is what I hear from most people. Also, I suggest that you “plan ahead” for their possible removal in the future — consider your dread removal options and consider what kind of conditioners would be best for your hair. Some people say that the extra oils in cheap conditioners are best while others swear by Mane n’ Tail or anything with placenta in it.

The basic technique for removing dreads is simple:

1) select your conditioners and a day where you’ll have at least the same abount of time it took you to do the dreads in the first place. This is a time-consuming process. If you forget how long it took you, figure in a minimum of eight to ten hours. It’s possible that you’ll even need a whole weekend.

2) bribe a friend to help you, if possible. this may help to cut your time in half.

3) pour a bunch of conditioner into a bowl and grab your comb. Don’t be seduced by those “detangler” combs, get a regular fine-toothed comb, prefereably one that promises to be unbreakable — but since you’ll probably break it anyway, get a minimum of two. They’re cheap, so quitcherbitchen.

4) scoop up a handful of conditioner and work from ends to scalp. spread the conditioner pretty thick at first and adjust how much you need per inch of length as it suits you.

5) comb out the dreads carefully and slowly in one-inch sections at a time per dread. It’s best to comb slowly, you’ll break less hair that way.

also: don’t be tempted to saturate your hair in water first. wet hair breaks more easily than dry hair. if you really want to start with wet hair, use a spray bottle and mist your hair.

Also consider *why* you need to remove your dreads. This can and should affect which method you use. Somebody who waits tables may want to keep their hair longer than somebody who works telephone tech support (many people think buzz-cuts on either women *or* men look “threatening”). I also know a girl who accidentally got a corn-based oil in her dreads and couldn’t wash it all out — now since most oils are fats, fats *will* rot and grow mould over time. Obviously, cutting off as much hair as she could get away with was the best option in her case.

March 26, 2006

Problems with wax:

Filed under: dreads, info — Ruadhán McElroy @ 12:25 am

If you go to a website designed to sell you dreadlock products and specifically “dread wax,” you’ll be told that you absolutely NEED their “dread wax” to make nice-looking dreads. On the other hand, if you REALLY start doing research on dreads, you’ll see mixed reports on how effective wax is to creating and maintaining nice-looking and healthy dreads.

Fact is, waxing newly-forming dreads is nothing more than one particular method. It’s not necessary. Some people will say wax is absolutely necessary and nothing but helpful, others will claim it will cause nothing but problems. Others will insist it’s neiter particularly harmful nor helpful, just unnecessary.

Here are some common problems I’ve seen reported with using wax in dreads:

  • Blow-drying wax can pretty much “turn your hair into a candle from the inside-out” (as somebody in a forum put it) and it can just end up making your hair harder than it should be. You want your dreads tight — not rock-hard.
  • It may not give desired results and can just end up making your hair look like crap.
  • too much wax (either aplied all at once or built-up over time) can cause breakage. No matter what you read on the sites for wax manufacturers, too much wax can cause breakage
  • wax has also been known to casuse rot cause too much was applied to the outside of the hair, it wasn’t washed out properly and since this couldn’t let the inside knots dry properly after washing it, life-forms (OK, mostly mildew) started forming.
  • wax doesn’t create knots, it just holds down loose hair, which can be a good thing at the begining stages, just keep in mind that it’s not necessary, even at the begining stages.

    Also, don’t take my word on it, I don’t have dreads yet, I’m still learning a lot of shit but this is the conclusion I’ve come to from reading other sites, considering my own knowledge of hair styling products and looking at photos and drawing my own conclusions. Experiment with wax if you feel like it, just keep in mind that no matter how nifty the company is, their main interest is selling you a product. Maybe they’ll use good reasons (like company ethics) to try and sell you that product or maybe they’ll just try to make you think that you NEED this product for whatever reason and through whatever means they can aquire; it’s also possible that they’ll do both.

    I like the company ethics that Knotty Boy claims on their site, so I link to them and suggest use of their products (though if you have hardcore evidence [ie: not hear-say] that they don’t adhere to these ethics like they say they do, by all means, tell me so that I can remove their link and stop supporting them in other ways), this does not mean that I feel using their products is necessary for creating dreadlocks, just that a) I like their company ethics and b) I think that their products offer one way to create dreads. If you use their products, you could end up with great results but over-using their waxes may prevent knots from forming or could cause build-up to the point that your hair is breaking off cos it’s too hard and heavy. If you don’t use their products, your resulting dreads could end up looking just fine or they could end up looking like crap.

    I can’t speak from expierence on this at the moment, so if somebody has some advice to offer on the topic of dreads, I’ll be more than happy to publish it.

  • March 25, 2006

    Pros and Cons of Manic Panic versus Special Effects Dye

    Filed under: hair colour, info — Ruadhán McElroy @ 6:26 pm

    I’m naming these two by brand name specifically because they’ve both been around forever and they’re both what a lot of people know best.

    Manic Panic Pros:

  • veggie-based and non-toxic — great for homes with small children or curious pets like cats and dogs
  • vegan friendly — if you care about that
  • company owned and managed, still to this day, by two women from NYC’s punk scene — if you care about that
  • wide variety of colours, some of which claim to glow under blacklight
  • semi-permanent and thus gentler on hair

    Manic Panic Cons:

  • the fact that it’s veggie-based and “natural” means that the results (colour, longevity, etc) won’t always turn out uniform — take their semi-permanent Black (called “Raven” in their catalogue): on some people it turns out a very dark green, on others it’s turned out a very dark or medium purple or red. A lot of people also report that the colour washes out faster than the wording on the jar implies while others claim that it stays just fine. They say they’ve tweaked the formula to improve its longevity and colour uniformity, but it’s still “all-natural veggie based” which means it will always have this flaw. Generally, though, their “gel formula” in the bottles (available on the company website, most retailers don’t carry the bottled stuff, only the stuff in jars) stays better and has a noticable better history of colour uniformity than the cream-stuff in the jars.
  • better uniformity in the MP jars seems to be brought about by abusing your hair more. Yes, if you check the website, Tish and Snooky’s hair looks great, just keep in mind that these two dolls have been killing their hair for about twenty-five years now. The more you abuse your hair (with bleach and perm solutions), the more porous it can become and thus the more willing it is to absorb any kind of colour you put on it. Manic Panic cream colours work best on hair that’s been chemically beaten into submission.

    Special Effects Pros:

  • Chemical-based, so it’s like doing your hair with SCIENCE! Also, the chemical basedness creates more uniformity of colours and increases longevity (still, as a rule, any semi-permanent dye will last longer and have brighter colours on hair that’s been bleached and otherwise been treated enough to be more porous).
  • vegan friendly — if you care about that
  • wide variety of colours, some of which claim to glow under blacklight

    Special Effects Cons:

  • Toxicity indeterminate. The bottle of toner I have states that it’s not tested on animals (which, these days, implies that animal testing is no longer necessary for the ingredients used), but also warns that using this product too close to the eyes may cause blindness
  • may be harder to find than Manic Panic — if memory serves me, MP has a few years on SpFX and has a bigger reputation, so a lot of beauty supplies (especially Sally) are urged to push MP, and more often than not, the employees pushing MP are pushing it because it’s been sold at Sally for, like, a hundred years or something and not because they actually know anything about the hair-dye itself.
  • Stains are often more ornery than MP stains (though not always)
  • You really shouldn’t dye animals1 with it, due to its chemical base and “may cause blindness” warning. I know a lot of people liked giving Kelly Osbourne crap over having her dog dyed to match her hair, but Manic Panic is an OK dye to use for temporarily dying pets — Special Effects should be avoided on animals. I’ve had cats accidentally get into my MP and the worst thing to happen was their hairballs came out slightly pink, and the cat was going to upchuck a hairball anyway, and as best as I could tell, the dye didn’t make it worse at all (and other people have on-purposely spotted a cat with MP cos they were dying their hair and the cat was being annoying). In fact, SpFX should be avoided in you live with animals that have tendancies to get into stuff or lick your head or something; if you have pets like that, and, say, they lick your head before your first shampooing, it may not cause any immediate problems from one or two licks, but the more they ingest in one sitting (before poping it out again) will increase the likliness of causing problems and your pet may need to get her stomach pumped.

    Note:
    1: I don’t advocate dying your pet on purpose, in fact, I advise against it most of the time, not because it puts the animal in danger or because you have to hold the animal down to do it (I know a girl, I stayed at her house for a few days, and her little longhaired teacup chihuahuas seemed to actually enjoy getting dyed to match her hair — but then again, I’m of the opinion that chihuahuas are actually an alien race that got stuck on this planet (cos contrary to popular belief, the Aztrecs or whoever didn’t have to breed those fuckers down to that tiny size, chihuahuas just kind of happened and it’s an evolutionary anomoly that they’re somehow the same species as, say, a real dog, like a pitbull). I advise against it because I’m not totally comfortable with people using critters as fashion accessories. Still, some of you people are going to want to dye your dog or cat anyway, so if you’re going to do it, might as well advise you on doing it right.

  • Powered by WordPress